Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Ghanaian In Labor Force | Age 35-44

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,439,739 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 84.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,561,930 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia	Ghanaian
Minimum	57.1%	69.3%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	42.9%	30.7%
Mean	84.5%	86.2%
Median	84.9%	85.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	78.6%	83.8%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	90.1%	89.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.5%	6.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.7%	6.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.7%	6.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Ghanaians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44

In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Haitian (84.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Belarus (84.8%, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from Europe (84.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (84.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from France (84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Pakistan (84.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Mongolian (84.8%, a difference of 0.020%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 35-44
Greeks	97.8 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 84.9%
Belgians	97.7 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 84.9%
Yugoslavians	97.7 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 84.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	97.5 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 84.9%
Immigrants \| France	97.4 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 84.9%
Immigrants \| Europe	97.2 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 84.9%
Ghanaians	97.2 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	97.1 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 84.8%
Mongolians	96.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	96.7 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 84.8%
Cubans	96.6 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 84.8%
Egyptians	96.6 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 84.8%
Indians (Asian)	96.1 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 84.8%
Haitians	96.0 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	95.9 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Australia	95.5 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	95.3 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Belarus	95.3 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Sweden	95.2 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 84.8%
South Americans	95.0 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 84.8%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	94.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 84.8%