Choctaw vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Choctaw
Houma
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Choctaw
Houma
81.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Houma In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,623,280 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 81.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,788,935 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519 and weighted average of 81.2%, a difference of 0.32%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Choctaw | Houma |
Minimum | 48.6% | 64.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 51.4% | 36.0% |
Mean | 77.3% | 83.2% |
Median | 77.9% | 80.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 69.7% | 76.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.6% | 91.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw and Houma by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Ute (80.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Creek (80.7%, a difference of 0.35%), Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Alaska Native (81.6%, a difference of 0.41%), Kiowa (81.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Shoshone (81.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and Colville (81.6%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 82.0% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.3% |