Subsaharan African vs Indian (Asian) Family Households
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Indian (Asian)
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Indians (Asian)
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Indian (Asian) Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,783,710 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 65.1%, a difference of 5.0%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Indian (Asian) |
Minimum | 32.6% | 36.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.4% | 63.2% |
Mean | 62.5% | 68.4% |
Median | 61.7% | 68.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.0% | 63.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.6% | 76.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 11.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Demographics Similar to Indians (Asian) by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Spaniard (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Haitian (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Chilean (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and English (65.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Swiss | 98.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Guatemalans | 98.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Central American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Haitians | 98.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |