Nigerian vs Immigrants from South Africa Average Family Size
COMPARE
Nigerian
Immigrants from South Africa
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Nigerians
Immigrants from South Africa
3.29
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.16
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
0.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nigerian vs Immigrants from South Africa Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,464,526 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.380 and weighted average of 3.29. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,270,414 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 3.16, a difference of 4.2%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nigerian | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 2.43 | 2.13 |
| Maximum | 3.90 | 4.50 |
| Range | 1.47 | 2.37 |
| Mean | 3.28 | 3.12 |
| Median | 3.34 | 3.06 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.23 | 2.78 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.45 | 3.34 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.22 | 0.56 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.29 | 0.56 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.29 | 0.55 |
Similar Demographics by Average Family Size
Demographics Similar to Nigerians by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Barbadian (3.29, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Oceania (3.29, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (3.29, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (3.29, a difference of 0.020%), and West Indian (3.29, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 3.30 |
| Peruvians | 99.2 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 3.30 |
| Sierra Leoneans | 99.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 3.30 |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 3.30 |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 98.8 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 98.7 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Barbadians | 98.6 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Nigerians | 98.6 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 98.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 98.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| West Indians | 98.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 98.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Bolivians | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 98.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Paiute | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Greece (3.16, a difference of 0.010%), Iroquois (3.16, a difference of 0.030%), American (3.16, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (3.16, a difference of 0.070%), and Maltese (3.16, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Turks | 1.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Potawatomi | 1.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Immigrants | Albania | 1.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 1.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Immigrants | Russia | 1.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 1.0 /100 | #263 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Americans | 1.0 /100 | #264 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 0.9 /100 | #265 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Immigrants | Greece | 0.9 /100 | #266 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Iroquois | 0.8 /100 | #267 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Maltese | 0.8 /100 | #268 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 0.7 /100 | #269 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.7 /100 | #270 | Tragic 3.16 |
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.7 /100 | #271 | Tragic 3.15 |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 0.6 /100 | #272 | Tragic 3.15 |