Inupiat vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Inupiat
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Inupiat
Sub-Saharan Africans
67.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,321,767 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461 and weighted average of 67.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 9.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 27.3% | 32.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 72.7% | 67.4% |
| Mean | 73.1% | 62.5% |
| Median | 70.0% | 61.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.9% | 58.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.8% | 68.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.7% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Cuban (67.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Sri Lankan (67.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Pakistan (67.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Samoan (67.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (68.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
| Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |