Immigrants from Asia vs Subsaharan African Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Subsaharan African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Sub-Saharan Africans
66.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Subsaharan African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,543,678 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448 and weighted average of 66.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,604,715 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 6.5%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 40.2% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.8% | 67.4% |
Mean | 70.1% | 62.5% |
Median | 69.0% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.5% | 58.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.1% | 68.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 10.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Pennsylvania German (66.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |