Immigrants from Serbia vs Samoan Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Samoan
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Samoans
28.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
21.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Samoan Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,646,358 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 28.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,867,082 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155 and weighted average of 32.6%, a difference of 15.4%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Samoan |
Minimum | 4.2% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 95.8% | 95.7% |
Mean | 33.1% | 42.4% |
Median | 27.0% | 35.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.1% | 28.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.0% | 45.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.8% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.2% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.0% | 24.2% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Egyptian (28.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Tongan (28.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (28.4%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Egypt (28.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (28.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 28.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Egyptians | 99.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Tongans | 98.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 98.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Palestinians | 98.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Bolivians | 98.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Colombia (32.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants (32.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Costa Rican (32.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Thailand (32.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Germany (32.8%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |