Immigrants from Oceania vs Maltese Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Maltese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Maltese
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
87.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Maltese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,423,443 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 64.7%, a difference of 0.28%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Maltese |
| Minimum | 8.8% | 45.8% |
| Maximum | 91.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 82.6% | 54.2% |
| Mean | 64.5% | 67.8% |
| Median | 67.1% | 67.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.7% | 62.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 72.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Maltese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Greek (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Cajun (64.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Greeks | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Maltese | 87.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 86.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 64.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 86.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 64.7% |