Taiwanese vs Immigrants from Brazil Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Immigrants from Brazil
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Taiwanese
Immigrants from Brazil
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Taiwanese vs Immigrants from Brazil Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,722,995 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,966,003 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 0.55%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Taiwanese | Immigrants from Brazil |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 13.9% |
| Range | 11.0% | 12.6% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 6.0% |
| Median | 5.4% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Taiwanese and Immigrants from Brazil by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Jordanian (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Inupiat (5.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |