Puget Sound Salish vs West Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
West Indian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
West Indians
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs West Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,152,398 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 6.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,984,061 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of West Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 6.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | West Indian |
Minimum | 4.5% | 4.7% |
Maximum | 34.2% | 15.7% |
Range | 29.7% | 11.1% |
Mean | 8.5% | 7.8% |
Median | 7.2% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.4% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and West Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Grenada (6.9%, a difference of 0.13%), French American Indian (6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Cheyenne (6.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Scotch-Irish (6.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Dominica (6.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Nonimmigrants (6.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (6.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.9% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.9% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |