Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from China Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Native/Alaskan
Immigrants from China
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Natives/Alaskans
Immigrants from China
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from China Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,663,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,804,939 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 60.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native/Alaskan | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.45% |
| Maximum | 13.7% | 5.7% |
| Range | 11.7% | 5.2% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 2.6% |
| Median | 5.9% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 0.49% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 0.87% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 0.86% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.79%), Tohono O'odham (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Houma (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Haitian (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Western Africa (2.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Okinawan (2.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (2.6%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Filipinos | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Salvadorans | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Haitians | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| West Indians | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Senegalese | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Nigerians | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Venezuelans | 99.4 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.6% |