Immigrants from South America vs Australian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Australian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Australians
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Australian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,161,675 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,102,055 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 0.78%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Australian |
| Minimum | 0.63% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 18.8% | 15.8% |
| Range | 18.1% | 13.3% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 6.9% |
| Median | 5.6% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America and Australians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Immigrants from Serbia (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and New Zealander (5.8%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Salvadorans | 98.4 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 98.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | South America | 97.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 97.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |