Colombian vs Alaskan Athabascan No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Colombian
Alaskan Athabascan
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Colombians
Alaskan Athabascans
10.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colombian vs Alaskan Athabascan No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,339,443 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Colombians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,793,877 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.685 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 55.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colombian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 1.4% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 31.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 30.0% | 99.0% |
Mean | 10.5% | 37.7% |
Median | 10.0% | 28.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 66.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 57.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 33.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 32.8% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Colombians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Colombians are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Israel (15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Tohono O'odham (15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Albanian (15.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Cypriot (15.7%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | China | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.4% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.5% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.6% |
Albanians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cypriots | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.7% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.7% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.4% |