Ute vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
COMPARE
Ute
Chickasaw
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Comparison
Ute
Chickasaw
6.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG SENIORS OVER 65 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,343,096 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,802,460 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 43.7%.
Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.87% |
Maximum | 48.4% | 28.2% |
Range | 47.4% | 27.4% |
Mean | 15.4% | 6.9% |
Median | 9.1% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.7% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.3% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.7% | 6.2% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Demographics Similar to Ute by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Paiute (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from the Azores (6.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Alaska Native (6.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Pima (6.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and Immigrants from Armenia (6.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 6.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 6.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 6.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 6.3% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 6.3% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 6.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 6.3% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 6.7% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 6.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 6.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 7.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.2% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.1% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Sudanese (4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (4.5%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Congo (4.5%, a difference of 2.0%), Tsimshian (4.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and Indonesian (4.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Comanche | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |