Laotian vs Immigrants from South Africa Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,034,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,751,568 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 0.16%.

Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Laotian	Immigrants from South Africa
Minimum	2.7%	3.0%
Maximum	29.6%	41.2%
Range	26.9%	38.2%
Mean	8.7%	15.0%
Median	7.2%	11.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	6.3%	6.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	8.9%	20.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.6%	13.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.7%	11.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.6%	11.0%

Demographics Similar to Laotians and Immigrants from South Africa by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Belarus (6.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uganda (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Arab (6.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Syrian (6.5%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Chilean (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uganda (6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uruguay (6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Pakistani (6.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Immigrants \| Colombia	87.6 /100 \| #111	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	87.5 /100 \| #112	Excellent 6.4%
Immigrants \| Egypt	87.1 /100 \| #113	Excellent 6.5%
Germans	86.3 /100 \| #114	Excellent 6.5%
Macedonians	86.1 /100 \| #115	Excellent 6.5%
Pakistanis	85.9 /100 \| #116	Excellent 6.5%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	85.7 /100 \| #117	Excellent 6.5%
Chileans	85.3 /100 \| #118	Excellent 6.5%
Immigrants \| South Africa	84.9 /100 \| #119	Excellent 6.5%
Immigrants \| Moldova	84.5 /100 \| #120	Excellent 6.5%
Immigrants \| Uganda	84.5 /100 \| #121	Excellent 6.5%
Immigrants \| Belarus	83.7 /100 \| #122	Excellent 6.5%
Laotians	83.6 /100 \| #123	Excellent 6.5%
Arabs	82.5 /100 \| #124	Excellent 6.5%
Syrians	82.1 /100 \| #125	Excellent 6.5%
Brazilians	81.9 /100 \| #126	Excellent 6.5%
Dutch	80.6 /100 \| #127	Excellent 6.5%
Immigrants \| Chile	80.5 /100 \| #128	Excellent 6.5%
Sri Lankans	80.3 /100 \| #129	Excellent 6.5%
Immigrants \| Peru	79.9 /100 \| #130	Good 6.5%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	79.2 /100 \| #131	Good 6.5%