Immigrants from Ukraine vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ukraine
Chickasaw
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Ukraine
Chickasaw
5.5%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
9.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ukraine vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 288,979,072 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,341,260 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 5.7%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ukraine | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 18.3% | 13.2% |
| Range | 16.7% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ukraine by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ukraine are Immigrants from Syria (5.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Lebanon (5.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Greece | 14.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 13.7 /100 | #200 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 13.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 13.1 /100 | #202 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 5.4% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 12.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 11.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 9.9 /100 | #206 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 9.3 /100 | #207 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 8.6 /100 | #208 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 8.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 5.5% |
| South American Indians | 7.6 /100 | #210 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Israelis | 7.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Hmong | 7.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 5.5% |
| Ugandans | 6.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Germany (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Western Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 87.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 86.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 83.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Chickasaw | 82.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Colombians | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Pakistanis | 80.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 80.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Lebanese | 79.9 /100 | #136 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 79.8 /100 | #137 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 79.7 /100 | #138 | Good 5.2% |
| Kenyans | 79.4 /100 | #139 | Good 5.2% |