Immigrants from South Africa vs Nicaraguan Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,473,164 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 5.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,967,437 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and unemployment rate amomg seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Africa	Nicaraguan
Minimum	2.2%	0.70%
Maximum	9.9%	13.5%
Range	7.7%	12.8%
Mean	6.0%	4.5%
Median	5.4%	4.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.7%	3.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.9%	5.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.2%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.0%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.0%	2.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Nicaraguans by Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Switzerland (5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (5.0%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Japan (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Moldova (4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), British (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Welsh (5.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 65 years
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 4.9%
Nicaraguans	99.3 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.2 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 4.9%
Japanese	99.2 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 4.9%
British	99.1 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 4.9%
Welsh	99.1 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 5.0%
Thais	99.1 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 5.0%
Slavs	98.9 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.8 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	98.6 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 5.0%
Estonians	98.5 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 5.0%
Serbians	98.4 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	98.3 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 5.0%
Filipinos	98.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Hungary	98.2 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	98.2 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	98.2 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 5.0%
Afghans	97.6 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	97.6 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| South Africa	97.6 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 5.0%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	97.3 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 5.0%