Immigrants from France vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from France
Indian (Asian)
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from France
Indians (Asian)
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from France vs Indian (Asian) Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,167,055 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.714 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 491,024,006 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.17%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from France | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 7.6% |
| Range | 48.9% | 4.8% |
| Mean | 8.8% | 5.0% |
| Median | 5.4% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 0.98% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 0.84% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France and Indians (Asian) by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |