Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,990,367 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 17.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 292,302,650 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemployment rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 17.2%, a difference of 1.1%.

Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Costa Rican	Immigrants from Oceania
Minimum	6.3%	12.4%
Maximum	100.0%	61.5%
Range	93.7%	49.1%
Mean	23.3%	23.5%
Median	18.1%	17.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.3%	16.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	27.1%	35.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.8%	19.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	16.5%	12.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	16.2%	12.5%

Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Oceania by Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Portuguese (17.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Afghan (17.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (17.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (17.4%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Malaysia (17.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Bolivian (17.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (17.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Croatia (17.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Basque (17.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 16 to 19 years
Immigrants \| Oceania	83.1 /100 \| #136	Excellent 17.2%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	82.8 /100 \| #137	Excellent 17.2%
Bolivians	81.9 /100 \| #138	Excellent 17.3%
Immigrants \| Eritrea	81.1 /100 \| #139	Excellent 17.3%
Immigrants \| Croatia	80.8 /100 \| #140	Excellent 17.3%
Basques	80.7 /100 \| #141	Excellent 17.3%
Spanish	79.3 /100 \| #142	Good 17.3%
Immigrants \| Egypt	79.1 /100 \| #143	Good 17.3%
Immigrants \| England	78.9 /100 \| #144	Good 17.3%
Indians (Asian)	77.6 /100 \| #145	Good 17.3%
Turks	77.1 /100 \| #146	Good 17.3%
Tsimshian	76.0 /100 \| #147	Good 17.3%
Romanians	74.9 /100 \| #148	Good 17.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	73.8 /100 \| #149	Good 17.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	72.5 /100 \| #150	Good 17.4%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	69.3 /100 \| #151	Good 17.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	69.0 /100 \| #152	Good 17.4%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	68.6 /100 \| #153	Good 17.4%
Afghans	68.1 /100 \| #154	Good 17.4%
Portuguese	67.3 /100 \| #155	Good 17.4%
Costa Ricans	65.9 /100 \| #156	Good 17.4%