Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Bulgaria Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,614,091 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,741,074 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bulgaria and unemployment rate among youth under the age of 25 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.47%.

Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chickasaw	Immigrants from Bulgaria
Minimum	1.6%	1.2%
Maximum	46.6%	28.0%
Range	45.0%	26.8%
Mean	15.2%	13.8%
Median	12.5%	12.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.5%	10.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	17.6%	16.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.1%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	9.1%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	9.1%	6.0%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Bulgaria by Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years

In terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Macedonian (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kenya (11.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Slavic (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bulgaria are Icelander (11.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Northern European (11.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Canada (11.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Bolivian (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Youth under 25 years
Immigrants \| Croatia	98.1 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 11.1%
Jordanians	97.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 11.1%
Immigrants \| Singapore	97.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 11.2%
Macedonians	97.7 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 11.2%
Chickasaw	97.7 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Kenya	97.6 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Moldova	97.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 11.2%
Slavs	97.5 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 11.2%
Bhutanese	97.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Australia	97.3 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 11.2%
Creek	97.2 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 11.2%
New Zealanders	97.2 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 11.2%
French	97.1 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 11.2%
German Russians	97.0 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 11.2%
Whites/Caucasians	96.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	96.7 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Canada	96.7 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 11.2%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	96.4 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 11.2%
Icelanders	96.3 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 11.2%
Northern Europeans	96.2 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 11.2%
Bolivians	96.1 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 11.2%