Welsh vs Immigrants from Norway Family Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Immigrants from Norway
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Immigrants from Norway
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Immigrants from Norway Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 525,428,616 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,627,868 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 0.10%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Welsh | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 4.7% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 20.0% |
Range | 95.3% | 19.6% |
Mean | 14.9% | 5.6% |
Median | 9.2% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.6% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Immigrants from Norway by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from South Africa (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Slavic (8.1%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Slavic (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Laotian (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |