Ute vs Swiss Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Swiss
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Swiss
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Swiss Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,044,614 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 47.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Swiss |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 4.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 52.5% |
| Range | 90.4% | 47.7% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 16.6% |
| Median | 25.0% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.5% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |