Turkish vs Immigrants from Iran Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Iran
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Iran
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Iran Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,706,785 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,844,732 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.321 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.92%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Iran |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 20.5% | 50.6% |
Range | 18.0% | 49.1% |
Mean | 9.0% | 9.7% |
Median | 8.7% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Iran by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Japan (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Asian (11.0%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Russian (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Pakistan (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czech (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Korean (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.1% |