Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Philippines Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Philippines
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Philippines
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Philippines Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,615,751 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,433,577 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.021 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 2.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Philippines |
Minimum | 4.5% | 7.7% |
Maximum | 41.7% | 61.4% |
Range | 37.1% | 53.7% |
Mean | 23.7% | 18.5% |
Median | 23.8% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.8% | 19.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Immigrants from Philippines by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |