Tongan vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Female Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,866,719 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,673,263 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 22.7% | 21.1% |
| Range | 17.6% | 19.7% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 10.3% |
| Median | 11.2% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Estonian (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Serbia (12.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Philippines (12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |