Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 436,349,491 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,992,242 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 1.3%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Sri Lankan	Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Minimum	1.7%	0.43%
Maximum	33.1%	27.1%
Range	31.4%	26.7%
Mean	15.7%	13.8%
Median	14.9%	13.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.7%	9.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.0%	17.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.3%	7.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.5%	5.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.5%	5.7%

Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16

In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Belgian (14.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ukraine (14.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Irish (14.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Carpatho Rusyn (14.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Denmark (14.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Portuguese (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Mongolian (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Armenian (15.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Immigrants \| Denmark	93.5 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 14.9%
Irish	93.4 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 14.9%
Belgians	93.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 14.9%
Sri Lankans	93.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	93.1 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 14.9%
Carpatho Rusyns	93.1 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 14.9%
Immigrants \| Norway	92.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	92.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 15.0%
Scottish	92.3 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 15.0%
South Africans	92.1 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.1 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 15.0%
Pakistanis	91.7 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.0%
Immigrants \| Brazil	91.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.1%
Czechoslovakians	91.0 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.1%
Palestinians	90.9 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.1%
Portuguese	90.6 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.3 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	90.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.1%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	89.7 /100 \| #129	Excellent 15.1%
Mongolians	89.5 /100 \| #130	Excellent 15.2%
Armenians	89.4 /100 \| #131	Excellent 15.2%