Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Brazil Male Poverty
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Brazil
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Brazil
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Brazil Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 439,980,227 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,783,904 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.187 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.23%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Brazil |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 43.1% | 33.7% |
Range | 40.5% | 31.9% |
Mean | 11.3% | 10.3% |
Median | 10.4% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 12.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Brazil by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Okinawan (10.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Palestinian (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Turkey (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Argentina (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |