Spanish American Indian vs Swiss Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spanish American Indian
Swiss
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Spanish American Indians
Swiss
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
42.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
24.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American Indian vs Swiss Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,039,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,637,180 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 21.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American Indian | Swiss |
Minimum | 6.5% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 73.5% | 87.5% |
Mean | 26.4% | 33.2% |
Median | 20.4% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.6% | 35.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 25.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 25.0% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians and Swiss by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are European (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |