Slavic vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Moroccan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Moroccans
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
40.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,477,501 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.77%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Moroccan |
| Minimum | 10.9% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 53.5% |
| Range | 89.1% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 35.9% | 24.5% |
| Median | 23.1% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.5% | 31.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.7% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.8% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), European (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and British (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |