Shoshone vs Yakama Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Shoshone
Yakama
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Shoshone
Yakama
16.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Shoshone vs Yakama Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,727,315 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,068,599 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 4.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Shoshone | Yakama |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 78.7% | 52.4% |
| Range | 77.9% | 46.7% |
| Mean | 27.1% | 20.7% |
| Median | 20.6% | 21.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.3% | 27.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.9% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.9% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.5% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Shoshone and Yakama by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Creek (16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.54%), Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.54%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.77%), American (15.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |