Panamanian vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Panamanian
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Panamanians
Whites/Caucasians
14.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,053,413 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 6.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Panamanian | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 64.6% | 33.9% |
| Range | 62.7% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 16.7% |
| Median | 12.9% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Moroccan (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |