Moroccan vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Moroccan
Luxembourger
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Moroccans
Luxembourgers
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
5.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Luxembourger Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,157,995 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,279,235 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.526 and weighted average of 13.8%, a difference of 28.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Moroccan | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 4.6% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 50.0% |
Range | 62.1% | 48.7% |
Mean | 23.3% | 11.9% |
Median | 17.9% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.8% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 14.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 9.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Japanese (17.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (17.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Osage (17.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Sierra Leonean (17.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Panamanian (17.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Alaskan Athabascans | 7.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 6.8 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.7 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.6% |
Aleuts | 6.6 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.7% |
Panamanians | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.7% |
Osage | 5.8 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.7% |
Moroccans | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.7% |
Japanese | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.7% |
Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.9% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 3.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Russian (13.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Australia (13.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.0% |