Moroccan vs Lithuanian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Moroccan
Lithuanian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Moroccans
Lithuanians
14.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
7.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Lithuanian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,724,575 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,598,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 25.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 51.5% | 27.5% |
| Range | 47.1% | 26.5% |
| Mean | 16.6% | 11.1% |
| Median | 13.4% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.1% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.4% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Moroccans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Malaysian (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Panamanian (14.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (14.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.80%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |