Marshallese vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Immigrants from Costa Rica
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,469,521 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,428,140 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 31.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 92.1% | 48.0% |
| Mean | 38.6% | 19.1% |
| Median | 23.3% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | 30.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.1% | 20.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.7% | 13.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.3% | 13.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.78%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Austria (12.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Ukrainian (12.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Western Asia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (12.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 85.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 84.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 83.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Salvadorans | 83.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
| Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |