Latvian vs Immigrants from Korea Family Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from Korea
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from Korea
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.4%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Immigrants from Korea Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,290,550 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.048 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 414,824,351 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.075 and weighted average of 7.4%, a difference of 4.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Immigrants from Korea |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.76% |
Maximum | 26.1% | 17.2% |
Range | 24.7% | 16.4% |
Mean | 6.7% | 6.5% |
Median | 6.0% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from Korea by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Singapore (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Bhutanese (7.0%, a difference of 0.44%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Immigrants from Scotland (7.3%, a difference of 0.39%), Cypriot (7.3%, a difference of 0.40%), Croatian (7.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Burmese (7.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.3%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.3% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.4% |