Kiowa vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Kiowa
Ute
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Kiowa
Ute
23.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,981,337 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.472 and weighted average of 23.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 8.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Ute |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 9.6% |
| Maximum | 50.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 49.7% | 90.4% |
| Mean | 27.7% | 33.1% |
| Median | 25.3% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.1% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.2% | 39.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 21.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 22.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 22.1% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Dominican (23.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (23.8%, a difference of 0.54%), Apache (23.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Central American Indian (22.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |