Japanese vs Chinese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Chinese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Chinese
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
26.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Chinese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,508,626 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,651,041 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 32.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 11.5% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.0% |
| Range | 88.5% | 41.7% |
| Mean | 28.5% | 16.1% |
| Median | 23.4% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.9% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.3% | 20.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.7% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Swiss (21.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 4.2%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |