Italian vs Samoan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Italian
Samoan
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Italians
Samoans
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Italian vs Samoan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 551,674,054 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,807,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 9.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Italian | Samoan |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 64.0% |
Range | 98.0% | 62.3% |
Mean | 14.4% | 16.5% |
Median | 10.7% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 17.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Italians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Luxembourger (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Slavic (15.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Welsh (15.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Icelander (15.7%, a difference of 0.38%), Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Albania | 80.7 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Venezuelans | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 79.4 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |