Immigrants vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants
Chinese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants
Chinese
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
7.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Chinese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,633,406 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,581,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 43.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Chinese |
Minimum | 7.6% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 39.2% | 53.8% |
Range | 31.6% | 51.4% |
Mean | 17.8% | 15.2% |
Median | 17.4% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 12.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.7%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Thailand (17.7%, a difference of 0.44%), Panamanian (17.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Sierra Leonean (17.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.70%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |