Immigrants from Norway vs Argentinean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Argentinean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Argentineans
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Argentinean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,674,936 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,942,880 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.050%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Argentinean |
| Minimum | 0.68% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 41.6% | 23.9% |
| Range | 40.9% | 22.4% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 10.5% |
| Median | 9.1% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Argentineans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.18%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%), French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |