Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Turkish Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Turkish
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Turks
11.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Turkish Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 289,323,815 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,728,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Turkish |
Minimum | 4.7% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 52.0% | 62.2% |
Range | 47.3% | 58.9% |
Mean | 15.9% | 18.2% |
Median | 12.0% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa and Turks by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Uruguayan (11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Chilean (11.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Argentinean (11.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Argentina (11.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Argentineans | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |