Immigrants from North America vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Chinese
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,351,855 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.749 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 21.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 19.1% |
Range | 97.7% | 17.8% |
Mean | 18.1% | 6.8% |
Median | 12.1% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.6% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.3% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Europe (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (7.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Ukrainian (7.9%, a difference of 0.12%), English (7.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Irish (7.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |