Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Guyanese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Guyanese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Guyanese
20.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Guyanese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,952,607 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 20.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,255,160 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.61%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Guyanese |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 6.8% |
| Maximum | 52.6% | 33.1% |
| Range | 45.2% | 26.2% |
| Mean | 22.0% | 19.3% |
| Median | 20.6% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Guyanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |