Immigrants from Central America vs French Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Central America
French
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Central America
French
21.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
72.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Central America vs French Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,407,533 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.696 and weighted average of 21.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,650,331 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of French and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 34.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Central America | French |
Minimum | 10.7% | 6.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 89.3% | 93.2% |
Mean | 31.3% | 27.8% |
Median | 25.1% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.7% | 16.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.4% | 29.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.7% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.0% | 21.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (21.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Houma (21.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 21.0% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 21.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 21.1% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 21.2% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 21.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 21.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 21.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 21.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to French by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to French are Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Slovak (15.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Guamanian/Chamorro (15.9%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Fiji (15.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Colombian (15.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Nepal | 78.5 /100 | #153 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |