Immigrants from Bolivia vs Bhutanese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Bhutanese
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Bhutanese
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Bhutanese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,688,041 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,976,396 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 0.79%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 31.2% |
| Range | 20.9% | 28.3% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 8.9% |
| Median | 7.3% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Bhutanese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |