Immigrants from Belgium vs Slavic Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,999,845 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,076,225 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 0.64%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Belgium	Slavic
Minimum	0.99%	2.0%
Maximum	60.8%	100.0%
Range	59.8%	98.0%
Mean	20.9%	29.6%
Median	18.8%	21.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.9%	16.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	26.0%	40.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	14.1%	23.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.9%	22.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.8%	22.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium and Slavs by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Hungarian (19.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (19.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Danish (19.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Japan (19.8%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Panamanian (19.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (19.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Canadian (19.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (19.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and Pennsylvania German (19.7%, a difference of 0.11%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Indians (Asian)	88.3 /100 \| #139	Excellent 19.6%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	85.6 /100 \| #140	Excellent 19.7%
Pennsylvania Germans	85.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 19.7%
Panamanians	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 19.7%
Slavs	84.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	84.1 /100 \| #144	Excellent 19.7%
Canadians	83.8 /100 \| #145	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	83.6 /100 \| #146	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Austria	83.1 /100 \| #147	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	81.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 19.7%
Immigrants \| Oceania	81.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 19.7%
Syrians	80.2 /100 \| #150	Excellent 19.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	79.7 /100 \| #151	Good 19.8%
Yugoslavians	79.0 /100 \| #152	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Japan	78.1 /100 \| #153	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	76.7 /100 \| #154	Good 19.8%
Hungarians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Belgium	76.4 /100 \| #156	Good 19.8%
Danes	75.5 /100 \| #157	Good 19.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.3 /100 \| #158	Good 19.8%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	74.4 /100 \| #159	Good 19.8%