Immigrants from Australia vs Chippewa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Chippewa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Chippewa
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Chippewa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,116,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 37.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 7.0% |
| Maximum | 48.6% | 78.4% |
| Range | 47.6% | 71.4% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 25.6% |
| Median | 10.3% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 31.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 15.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Indian (Asian) (12.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |