Immigrants from Armenia vs Sudanese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Armenia
Sudanese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Armenia
Sudanese
13.9%
POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Armenia vs Sudanese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,715,591 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,120,634 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Armenia | Sudanese |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 24.7% | 40.5% |
Range | 22.8% | 39.8% |
Mean | 12.7% | 15.4% |
Median | 12.4% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Armenia and Sudanese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are French American Indian (13.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Cuban (13.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Ghanaian (13.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Laos (13.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and Nicaraguan (13.9%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Ecuadorian (14.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Salvadoran (14.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (14.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Sudan (14.1%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |