Immigrants from Argentina vs Latvian Single Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,466,881 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,777,893 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 0.28%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Argentina	Latvian
Minimum	6.3%	6.0%
Maximum	55.7%	90.7%
Range	49.4%	84.7%
Mean	19.7%	24.7%
Median	18.2%	18.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.6%	16.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	22.4%	25.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.9%	9.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.9%	16.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.8%	16.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Latvians by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Macedonian (18.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants \| Armenia	99.9 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 18.7%
Tongans	99.9 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 18.8%
Bulgarians	99.9 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 18.8%
Okinawans	99.9 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.9 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 18.8%
Jordanians	99.9 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Romania	99.9 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 18.8%
Immigrants \| Croatia	99.9 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 18.9%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 18.9%
Macedonians	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 18.9%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 19.0%
Immigrants \| Argentina	99.8 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 19.0%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.8 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 19.0%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	99.8 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 19.0%
Immigrants \| Italy	99.8 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 19.0%
Egyptians	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 19.1%
Tsimshian	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 19.1%
Argentineans	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Fiji	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 19.1%
Eastern Europeans	99.7 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 19.1%