Hungarian vs Immigrants from Chile Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hungarian
Immigrants from Chile
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Hungarians
Immigrants from Chile
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
59.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs Immigrants from Chile Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,762,053 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634 and weighted average of 8.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,435,761 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hungarian | Immigrants from Chile |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 82.8% | 15.0% |
Range | 80.4% | 14.0% |
Mean | 16.1% | 9.0% |
Median | 9.5% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 11.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.9% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.6% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and Immigrants from Chile by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Ethiopian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Kenyan (8.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Lebanese (8.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Peru (8.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |
Kenyans | 58.2 /100 | #170 | Average 8.9% |
Lebanese | 57.6 /100 | #171 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Peru | 57.5 /100 | #172 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 56.4 /100 | #173 | Average 8.9% |
Immigrants | Albania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 9.0% |